Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA)
Legislation: Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA) — HB 1709 / SB 2700
Status: Proposed; under legislative consideration (2025–2026 Texas legislative session)
Official Source: Texas Legislature Online
Currently in Effect: Texas CUBI (Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act)
Overview
Texas does not currently have an enacted, comprehensive AI hiring law equivalent to Illinois AIVIA, NYC Local Law 144, or Colorado's AI Act (SB24-205). However, Texas employers face two significant regulatory considerations:
- TRAIGA (Texas Responsible AI Governance Act): Proposed comprehensive AI governance legislation that would impose risk-based requirements on AI systems used in consequential employment decisions
- CUBI (Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act): An existing Texas law that currently applies to biometric data collection in hiring, including facial recognition and voiceprint analysis
This page covers TRAIGA. See the Texas CUBI guide for current biometric compliance requirements.
What Is TRAIGA?
The Texas Responsible AI Governance Act is proposed legislation modeled on a risk-based AI governance framework similar to Colorado's SB24-205 and the EU AI Act. Key proposed provisions include:
Proposed Risk Classification System
TRAIGA proposes classifying AI systems by risk level:
| Risk Tier | Description | Examples in Hiring |
|---|---|---|
| High Risk | AI making or substantially influencing decisions with significant impact on people's rights or opportunities | Resume screening AI, video interview AI, candidate scoring |
| Limited Risk | AI with moderate impact but limited decision-making authority | Customer service chatbots |
| Minimal Risk | AI with minimal individual impact | Spam filters |
Employment AI tools fall in the High Risk tier under TRAIGA's proposed framework.
Proposed Requirements for High-Risk AI in Employment
Under TRAIGA as proposed, employers deploying high-risk AI in hiring or employment decisions would need to:
1. Impact Assessment
- Conduct a risk assessment before deploying high-risk AI systems
- Document the system's purpose, data used, and potential for discriminatory impact
- Reassess annually and after significant AI system updates
2. Transparency and Disclosure
- Provide notice to candidates that high-risk AI is being used in decisions affecting them
- Explain what the AI evaluates and how outputs influence decisions
- Make contact information available for complaints or appeals
3. Human Oversight
- Ensure meaningful human review is available for AI-influenced consequential decisions
- Prohibit fully automated adverse decisions without human review capability
4. Anti-Discrimination Provisions
- High-risk AI systems may not produce outputs constituting illegal discrimination under Texas or federal law
- Periodic testing for disparate impact across protected classes
5. Incident Reporting
- Report AI incidents resulting in harm or discrimination to the Texas AG or designated regulatory body
Proposed Enforcement
| Enforcement Type | Details (Proposed) |
|---|---|
| Primary authority | Texas Attorney General |
| Civil penalties | Up to $15,000 per violation (proposed) |
| Injunctive relief | Courts could order discontinuation of non-compliant AI use |
| Private right of action | Some proposals include individual civil claims |
Current Status: What Texas Employers Must Do Today
As of March 2026, TRAIGA has not been enacted. However:
- Multiple versions have been introduced in the Texas legislature
- The 2025 Texas legislative session included significant debate on AI governance
- Industry groups and state agencies are actively shaping final requirements
- Enactment is possible in 2025–2026
Current Texas AI Obligations (Already in Effect)
Even without TRAIGA, Texas employers using AI in hiring face current obligations:
| Law | Status | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Texas CUBI (Business & Commerce Code § 503.001) | In effect | Biometric data notice and consent in hiring |
| EEOC AI Guidance | In effect | Title VII applies to discriminatory AI hiring outcomes |
| Texas Labor Code § 21.001 | In effect | State anti-discrimination law; applies to AI-caused disparate impact |
EEOC Obligations for Texas Employers (Current Law)
The EEOC has clarified that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act applies to AI hiring tools. Employers are liable for discriminatory outcomes produced by AI, even if unintentional (disparate impact theory). EEOC AI guidance applies regardless of any state-level TRAIGA status.
Texas employers using AI in hiring should conduct disparate impact testing today — both to comply with federal law and to prepare for TRAIGA.
Multi-State Context for Texas Employers
Texas employers who also hire in other states must already comply with stricter AI hiring laws in those states:
| State | Law | Key Obligation |
|---|---|---|
| New York City | Local Law 144 | Annual independent bias audit + public publication |
| California | AB 2930 | Annual bias testing + pre-use disclosure |
| Colorado | SB24-205 | Impact assessments + annual AG reporting |
| Illinois | AIVIA + BIPA | Consent, disclosure, data deletion, biometric rules |
| Washington | SB 5116 | AEDS disclosure + impact assessment |
Building a compliant AI hiring framework for these stricter states now will position Texas employers for TRAIGA compliance when enacted.
Proactive TRAIGA Compliance Strategy
Given TRAIGA's legislative trajectory, Texas employers using AI in hiring should proactively:
- Audit AI hiring tools: Document all AI systems used in employment decisions
- Assess risk levels: Determine which tools would qualify as "high-risk" under TRAIGA's proposed framework
- Prepare disclosure templates: Draft candidate notice language for AI tool use
- Establish human review workflows: Ensure AI-influenced hiring decisions can be reviewed by humans
- Monitor bias: Begin internal testing of AI tools for disparate impact across protected classes
- Track CUBI compliance: CUBI is already in effect — see Texas CUBI guide
- Watch for TRAIGA updates: Monitor the 2025–2026 Texas legislative session
Industries with Highest TRAIGA Exposure
| Industry | Risk Level | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Technology companies | High | Frequent AI hiring tool adoption; large scale |
| Energy sector | High | Major Texas employer; AI used in technical screening |
| Healthcare | High | High-volume hiring; AI would intersect with healthcare AI rules |
| Financial services | High | ATS and screening AI widely deployed |
| Staffing agencies | Very High | High volume; AI screening central to operations |
Compliance Checklist for Texas Employers (TRAIGA + Current Law)
- Comply with Texas CUBI for biometric data in hiring (in effect now)
- Inventory all AI tools used in Texas hiring
- Assess which tools would be "high-risk" under TRAIGA's proposed framework
- Document AI tool purpose, data sources, and hiring decision influence
- Draft candidate disclosure language for AI use in hiring
- Establish human review processes for AI-influenced hiring decisions
- Begin disparate impact testing under EEOC guidance
- Monitor TRAIGA legislative progress in 2025–2026 session
- Build multi-state compliance workflows if hiring in NYC, California, Colorado, or Illinois
How EmployArmor Helps
EmployArmor prepares Texas employers for TRAIGA readiness:
- AI audit templates: Inventory and classify AI hiring tools by risk level
- Disclosure drafting: Pre-built candidate notice templates aligned with proposed TRAIGA requirements
- Bias testing tools: Coordinate disparate impact testing across protected classes
- CUBI compliance: Texas biometric consent forms and vendor assessment tools
- Regulatory monitoring: Real-time alerts when TRAIGA or related Texas legislation advances
- Multi-state compliance: Combined compliance workflows for Texas employers hiring in regulated states
Get your Texas AI Hiring Readiness Assessment →
Texas Employer Resources
- Texas Employment Law Compliance Hub
- Texas AI Hiring Compliance Guide
- Texas HR Compliance Software
- Texas CUBI Guide (current biometric law)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TRAIGA currently law in Texas?
Answer: No. As of March 2026, TRAIGA has not been enacted. However, the Texas Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI) is currently in effect and applies to biometric data in hiring. See the Texas CUBI guide for current obligations.
What Texas AI law is currently in effect for hiring?
Answer: The Texas CUBI (Business & Commerce Code § 503.001) is currently in effect and applies to biometric data collection in hiring — including facial recognition and voiceprint analysis. Federal EEOC AI guidance also applies to all Texas employers.
If we hire remotely and candidates are in other states, do those states' AI laws apply?
Answer: Yes. AI hiring laws in Illinois, New York City, California, Colorado, and Washington apply based on candidate location. Texas employers hiring in those states must comply with those laws today, regardless of TRAIGA's status.
What is the best TRAIGA preparation strategy?
Answer: Adopt a risk-based AI governance framework now: audit your tools, implement candidate disclosures, establish human review processes, and conduct bias testing. This positions you for compliance with TRAIGA and any other state AI law your hiring operations touch.
What is the difference between TRAIGA and Texas CUBI?
Answer: CUBI (currently in effect) covers biometric identifiers specifically — facial geometry, voiceprints, fingerprints. TRAIGA (proposed) would create a broader AI governance framework covering all high-risk AI in employment, not just biometric data.
Last updated: March 2026. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. TRAIGA status and requirements may change as legislation advances. Consult qualified employment counsel for guidance specific to your organization.
Related Laws and Resources: